Introduction
I am giving a review on an article from Marc Lallanilla ( January 11, 2016 ) titled Facts About Genetically Modified Food. I am going to discuss the issues that are currently happening in Genetically Modified Organism such as how safe they are, the labelling issue and the politics of Genetically Modified Organism . Later on, I did some study on misconceptions that people often did on Genetically Modified Organism. It is important for people out there to acknowledge on this so that they know what are they eating and so that they are staying on eating on a right track.
Body
1) What is GMO ?
A genetically modified organism, or GMO, is an organism that has had its DNA altered or modified in some way through genetic engineering.In most cases, GMOs have been altered with DNA from another organism, be it a bacterium, plant, virus or animal; these organisms are sometimes referred to as "transgenic" organisms. A genefrom a spider that helps the arachnid produce silk, for example, could be inserted into the DNA of an ordinary goat.
2) How safe are GMOs?
From the article, it is said that there are two very different viewpoints when it comes to the health and safety of genetically engineered food .Vocal anti-GMO activists who refer to GMO crops as "Frankenfoods" argued that GMOs can cause environmental damage and health problems for consumers.Mary Vandewiele, co-owner of The Better Health Store, a chain of 14 health-oriented stores, says that the long-term effect of GMOs remain unknown. “In reading the literature, most of the science and myths are not clear and appear to be intertwined. GMOs have clearly impacted our food industry but to what extent the damage is and can be long term, appears to be uncertain and that is a problem.”However, many scientific organizations believe the fear-mongering that runs through discussions of GMO foods is more emotional than factual.
Others point goes to the benefits of sturdier crops with higher yields. "GM crops can improve yields for farmers, reduce draws on natural resources and fossil fuels and provide nutritional benefits," according to a statement on the website for Monsanto, the world's largest manufacturer of GMOs.
From my point of view, the GMO supporter does not give their proof on how safe to eat the GMO foods. In fact, they are discussing of how GMOs going to benefit the farmers of industrial agriculture by producing higher number of crops yielded.
3) GMO labeling debated
In November 2015, the FDA issued a ruling that only requires additional labeling of foods derived from genetically engineered sources if there is a material difference — such as a different nutritional profile — between the GMO product and its non-GMO equivalent.
“[In addition to the FDA ruling], recently the American Medical Association re-affirmed that there is no scientific justification for special labeling of foods that contain GM ingredients; the American Association for the Advancement of Science stated a similar stance. We support these positions and the FDA’s approach,” according to Monsanto. “Additionally, many independent scientists and organizations around the world — such as the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, World Health Organization, American Medical Association and the American Association for Advancement of Science have looked at thousands of scientific studies and concluded that GM food crops do not pose more risks to people, animals or the environment than any other foods.”
The argument over the development and marketing of GMO foods clearly was a hot issue by these recent years.
4) The politics of GMOs
In addition to the scientific debate over GMOs, genetically modified foods have also become a political football. Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) sponsored a bill that would block state and local laws from requiring food labels to disclose genetically engineered ingredients, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile, Vermont, Connecticut and Maine have passed mandatory labeling laws for genetically modified food. At least 15 other states are considering similar regulations.”
In 2012, voters in California were asked if food made from GMOs should be labeled as such. The initiative was defeated — but only after GMO proponents like Monsanto, General Mills, Pepsico, DuPont, Hershey, Cargill, Kellogg, Hormel, Kraft, Mars, Goya, Ocean Spray, Nestle and other industrial food marketers spent millions on advertising to convince voters to vote against the measure.
Opponents in several states and countries continue to push for GMO labels on foods if not outright bans on GMO foods but industry and science insists the foods are safe, labels aren't needed and they'll just confuse consumers.
Discussion/Conclusion
It seems that there are many questionable issues about GMOs. From what I see, the never ending debates are mostly caused by the misconceptions that many people do not know and from that, some of them insisted of wanting the labels to be put. The misconceptions include :
The new labels will make it uniformly easy to identify what has been genetically engineered.
Actually: Consumers may need to scan a package to see if an ingredient was genetically modified, and even then they are unlikely to learn which traits were altered or why. At the most basic level, a G.M.O. is a plant or animal whose DNA was altered in a laboratory, often by inserting genes from a distant species into its cells with the help of a bacterium or with other tools. Many major food manufacturers are loath to put the words “genetic engineering” on labels for fear that they will convey an impression that the foods are suspect. Under the new law, manufacturers can instead label packages with a symbol denoting genetically engineered ingredients, or a “quick response” (Q.R.) code that people with smartphones could scan to retrieve the information.
Apart from that, most of the industries are more likely to put aside those labelling matter because it might burden their work as well as having to consider about the costs that it will take to change from what it used to be. The industry and science insists the foods are safe, labels aren't needed and they'll just confuse consumers.
For me, I support the labelling of GMOs on product. If the science said that it does not matter because it will just confuse the customers, hence the government should spread the truth behind GMO products such as what are their benefits or what are their effects on certain people who have allergies and stuff like that. What’s important is just put the label so that sooner or later, people will have acknowledge more on what they eat instead of eating blindly.
Abstract
I am doing a personal review on an article titled Facts About Genetically Modified Food. There are some issues happening and it had taken more on the labelling issue. There are a few readings that I made from different resources to clear up a misconception that people probably experience based on this issue that might lead to the labelling issue. I am also giving my opinion whether to support the labelling or not.
References
1) https://www.livescience.com/40895-gmo-facts.html
2) https://www.fda.gov/aboutfda/transparency/basics/ucm194877.htm
3) https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/07/12/science/gmo-misconceptions.html
4) science.howstuffworks.com › Science › Life Science › Genetic Science










